COMPETITION: Win The Terror: Devil in Silver on DVD

WITH TWO highly acclaimed series under its belt, The Terror returns to our screens for its third thrilling outing, so prepare for scares with The Terror: Devil in Silver when it arrives in a stunning Blu-ray and DVD release on 5 October 2026, as well as available to download and own from 28 September 2026 thanks to Acorn Media International.

And to celebrate we have a copy on DVD to give away!

Synopsis:

Based on Victor LaValle’s best-selling book and adapted by the writer himself alongside Chris Cantwell, The Terror: Devil in Silver boasts film maestro Ridley Scott as its executive producer. Internationally acclaimed British acting sensation Dan Stevens (The Guest, Downton Abbey, Beauty and the Beast) takes the lead in an awe-inspiring turn as a psychiatric patient who must face not only his own demons but possibly one of the most sinister entities known to man.

Pepper (Stevens) is a working-class removal man who, through a combination of bad luck and a bad temper, finds himself wrongfully committed to New Hyde Psychiatric Hospital – an institution filled with the people society would rather forget.

There, he must contend with patients who work against him, doctors who harbour grim secrets and perhaps even the Devil himself. As Pepper navigates a hellscape where nothing is as it seems, he finds that the only path to freedom is to face down the entity that thrives on the suffering within the hospital walls – but doing so may prove that the worst demons of all live inside him. 

Beware The Terror: Devil in Silver is a must-own release to add to your physical media collection.

Pre-Order from https://link.amazon/B0g0rQEx5

Enter now for a chance to win.

Who wrote the best-selling book that The Terror is based on?

Send your name, address and of course the answer to competition365@outlook.com

Quick Terms and conditions

1. Closing date 12-10-26

2. No alternative prize is available

3. When the competition ends as indicated on this page, any and all entries received after this point will not count and emails blacklisted due to not checking this page first.

4. Winners will be chosen randomly and will be informed via email.

5. Entries that come directly from other websites will not be accepted.

Amala Ekpunobi - The View’s Sunny Hostin Gets Caught In Massive Lie

Sunny Hostin’s account of her role in a notorious 1991 murder trial has come under fresh scrutiny after she claimed on The View that she was the lone juror who refused to convict Daniel Rakowitz. Hostin portrayed herself as the decisive holdout, saying she persuaded the other 11 jurors that Rakowitz was not criminally responsible because of his mental state. The story was presented as a personal example of how a single juror can prevent a conviction, with Hostin making clear that she was claiming that role for herself.

The problem is that contemporary accounts of the trial do not match that story. Reports from 1991 identified an unemployed male juror as the main holdout, while another report indicated that Hostin, then known as Asunción Cummings, was one of two jurors pushing for an insanity verdict. Most importantly, Hostin's own comments at the time described the final decision as a compromise and indicated that the jury did not believe Rakowitz had deliberately intended to kill the victim. That is a very different account from the one she has now given. The available contemporary evidence does not support Hostin's claim that she was the lone holdout who single-handedly persuaded the rest of the jury, making her current retelling appear to be a substantially altered version of what actually happened.

Andrew Neil Puts Brexit Rejoin Argument Under the Microscope on Question Time

Andrew Neil delivered a blunt response to the latest push for Britain to move back towards the European Union during BBC Question Time, challenging what he saw as some of the simplistic arguments being used by those advocating closer European integration. Neil took particular aim at the suggestion that Britain has been left economically flatlining by Brexit, pointing out that several major EU economies have also experienced sluggish growth. His argument was straightforward: blaming Britain's economic performance entirely on Brexit becomes considerably harder when countries that remained inside the EU are facing many of the same problems.

Neil also challenged the idea that returning to the single market or customs union would automatically solve Britain's economic problems. Germany, France and Italy have all experienced weak growth despite remaining within the EU, while UK GDP grew by 1.3% in 2025, compared with 0.9% in France, 0.3% in Germany and 0.7% in Italy. Those figures formed an important part of Neil's wider point, because they directly challenged the portrayal of Britain as uniquely suffering while the rest of Europe prospers.

The exchange highlighted the growing divide between the political arguments surrounding Brexit and the economic reality being presented in the latest figures. Neil's intervention was essentially a demand for the Rejoin argument to be tested against what is actually happening in Europe today, rather than relying on the assumption that Britain's problems can simply be attributed to leaving the EU. Whatever view someone takes on Brexit, his figures put a sizeable hole in the claim that EU membership automatically protects countries from economic stagnation.

8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown - 30 minutes of Sean Lock's BEST solves

Sean Lock was one of Britain’s most distinctive comedians, celebrated for his dry delivery, sharp observations and wonderfully unpredictable sense of humour. Best known for his regular appearances on 8 Out of 10 Cats and 8 Out of 10 Cats Does Countdown, he had a gift for turning everyday situations into brilliantly absurd routines, often delivered with a perfectly straight face. His stand-up career established him as a highly respected comic, while his television appearances introduced his unique style to a much wider audience. Known for his quick wit and ability to find humour in the ordinary, Lock remained a much-loved figure in British comedy and left behind a body of work that continues to entertain audiences.

Host of The View, Sunny Hostin, brags about preventing The Butcher of Thompson Square Park from going to prison.

 

Sunny Hostin brags about being a holdout juror that prevented The Butcher of Thompson Square Park from going to prison.

She admits "once he killed her, he chopped up her body parts, yes, boiled her body parts ... and fed her body parts to the unhoused."

Sunny Hostin brags about being a holdout juror that prevented The Butcher of Thompson Square Park from going to prison.
She admits "once he killed her, he chopped up her body parts, yes, boiled her body parts ... and fed her body parts to the unhoused." pic.twitter.com/sLbElgLuGt

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) September 22, 2026

24 Hours To Go Broke - Visiting The MOST DISTURBING German Village?!

 

Josh Widdicombe and Greg Rutherford head to Bavaria, venturing further into the state to uncover some of its most unique and bizarre sights. Along the way, they meet locals who, upon closer inspection, aren’t quite what they seem.

24 Hours To Go Broke Series 1 Episode 3

24 Hours To Go Broke is a high-pressure entertainment series that challenges contestants to spend a substantial amount of money within just 24 hours, with the clock constantly ticking and the risk of walking away empty-handed. Combining fast-paced challenges, unexpected twists and plenty of difficult decisions, the series tests how far contestants are willing to go when faced with the ultimate spending deadline.

Amala Ekpunobi - The Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Is Black…Oops

 

The revelation that the lone holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial is a Black man presents an awkward dilemma for sections of the left-wing press that spent the week portraying him as an unreasonable obstacle to justice while apparently attempting to uncover details about his identity and past. Having built a narrative around the supposedly problematic juror, they now face an uncomfortable choice: continue attacking him and risk accusations that their coverage was based on assumptions about who he was, or acknowledge that the reality does not fit as neatly into the narrative they had constructed. The question now is whether those outlets will reconsider their coverage, quietly move on, or simply find a different angle through which to justify the campaign against the juror.